home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: comp.vuw.ac.nz!waikato!kcbbs!riplin
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
- Subject: Re: Is COBOL Dead?!
- From: riplin@kcbbs.gen.nz (Richard Plinston)
- Date: 22 Mar 96 02:08:05 GMT
- Message-ID: <329681.7685.12167@kcbbs.gen.nz>
- References: <4ibtqm$1u7@news.netcentral.co.uk>
- Organization: Kappa Crucis Unix BBS, Auckland, New Zealand
-
- In message <<4ibtqm$1u7@news.netcentral.co.uk>> <> writes:
- > > >
- > > > Try to port the "hello, world" program to COBOL. If your interest in
- > > > COBOL survives this experience, go ahead with gCOBOL :-) You may also
- > > > like AppleScript, which should have been named son-of-COBOL :-)
- > >
- > > Let me see now, full ANSI85 program:
- > >
- > > Identification Division.
- > > Program-Id. Hello.
- > > Procedure Division.
- > > Main.
- > > DISPLAY "Hello World".
- > >
- > > Wow, that is almost several pages.
- > >
- > Yeah we all know how crap, how slow, how long winded cobol is
- > and some of us are forced to use it as it's part of my college
- > course. We really complained but it did no good.
-
- In what way is Cobol crap ? It does the job it was designed to do
- probably better than any other language. Of course no one would
- want to write games in it, or operating systems, but then they
- are not business systems.
-
- In what way is Cobol slow ? I have some programs here where the
- Cobol version outperforms the C version. Then again, most
- business applications don't need a lot of grunt - how much
- processor time does it take to multiply a price by a quantity
- and add the tax ?
-
- Whether Cobol is long-winded or not, and whether it matters,
- depends on several factors beyond the understanding of a
- student used to write-only languages.
-
-